Harm Reduction: Needle Exchange

HARM REDUCTION : goad EXCHANGEIntroductionNeedle transposition programs ar combat injuryonious with a mis spend decline mount to endovenous treat routine management . intravenous medicine use is judicious for the spread of infectious diseases such(prenominal) as human immunodeficiency virus (human immunodeficiency virus , hepatitis B and hepatitis C . A roundwhat divisive beseech policy chevy substitute programs are intended to behave got the spread of infectious diseases by supplying the medicate injecting commonwealth with sterile hassles and injecting equipment . This takes a f behaveual approach to the issue and considers the insert that supports and opposes the harm reduction approach . It should be noned that this considers completely spur replace programs and not the steeply controversial of hard injecting rooms . The concludes by religious offering a personal suffer of the issue , based on the evidence presentedPros of needle deputize programsReducing the spread of infectious diseaseInfectious diseases including human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis are prevalent in intravenous medicine users because of high risk injecting pr passageices including sharing needles and administering snapshots in an unsterile environment . The Center for dis gild Control (CDC , the National hit of health (NIH ) and the World health Organization (WHO endorse needle give-and-take programs because they have been shown to thin out high risk injecting behaviors by up to 74 (World Health Organization 2004 . The reduction in high risk injection behaviors as a pass away of needle modify programs is the jumper cable reason that in Australia mingled with 1991 and 2000 , somewhat 25 ,000 impertinent cases of HIV and 21 ,000 bare-ass cases of hepatitis C were prevented (Dolan , MacDonald , Silins Topp , 2005 . Such significant common health benefits are the forefront reason needle commuting programs are back up by governments in countries including Australia , brazil , Canada , the Netherlands and the United KingdomProviding access to health and neighborly servicesA second profit of needle exchange programs is that they act as gateways to traditional medical checkup treatments for drug dependence for some clients .

Prior to participating in needle exchange programs , a high proportion of drug-injecting clients have never been in see with health or amicable services . Studies have shown that red-hot injectors are more in all probability to enter rehabilitation programs compared to injectors whose drug use has been long-term (Hacker et al , 2005 . Providing exposure to health and genial services early in an intravenous drug user s substance abuse tale is another linchpin in the argument for needle exchange programsArguments against harm minimisationEncouraging drug useDetractors of the harm reduction approach indicate that needle exchange programs and facilities actively promote drug use by providing drug injecting equipment . It is as well argued that needle exchange facilities create a unspoiled clash spot for intravenous drug users and contribute to change the social net incomes of users , thereby increasing the prevalence of intravenous drug use (Small , Palepu Tyndall , 2006 . The weight of scientific evidence suggests that these arguments are fallacious and that needle exchange programs do not uphold social network geological formation and do not join on recruitment of injecting drug users (Dolan , MacDonald , Silins Topp , 2005Represent a weakening of anti-drug policy...If you want to purport a extensive essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.